Jul 13, 2013; Chicago, IL, USA; Chicago Cubs starting pitcher Matt Garza (22) throws a pitch during the seventh inning against the St. Louis Cardinals at Wrigley Field. The Cubs won 6-4. Mandatory Credit: Dennis Wierzbicki-USA TODAY Sports

Red Sox Unlikely To Heavily Pursue Matt Garza


For the first time in years, the Red Sox are not only seriously contending at the trade deadline, but they have an abundance of trade chips in the minor leagues. Normally, this would equate to the Red Sox being major spenders at the trading deadline. However, it is looking like this season may be different in a number of respects. The Red Sox have already made one trade, acquiring Matt Thornton from the White Sox in return for toolsy but raw Double-A outfielder Brandon Jacobs. One name has been paired with the Red Sox in trade rumors for years, Matt Garza, and it looks like the Red Sox may not jump on the chance to acquire him here in 2013.

After dealing with various injuries in his tenure with the Cubs (2011-present), Garza is finally making himself into an excellent trade piece for a Cubs team far out of contention. In 2013, Garza has a 3.17 ERA, 1.14 WHIP, and 62:20 K:BB ratio in 71 innings pitched (11 starts). He has dealt with a lat strain this season, which kept him out for the beginning of the year. However, now that he is finally pitching every five days, he has been fantastic for the Cubs in his contract year.

Regardless of all the success that Garza has had in his career and recently, Ben Cherington and the Red Sox front office is right to not be heavily involved. Cost aside, there just is no room for Garza in the Red Sox rotation. Once Clay Buchholz returns, the Red Sox will have a rotation of Buchholz (9-0, 1.71), John Lackey (7-6, 2.78), Ryan Dempster (5-8, 4.04), Felix Doubront (6-3, 3.91), and Jon Lester (8-5, 4.60 but not going anywhere). That is a damn good major league rotation, and adding Garza would make it exceptional, but there’s no place to put him.

Now, to look at the cost. Experts have predicted that a trade for Garza would be similar to last year’s trade of Anibal Sanchez and Omar Infante from the Marlins to the Tigers. Though there was a second everyday player involved in that trade, the Marlins netted Jacob Turner (a top prospect), Rob Brantly (a top prospect), and Brian Flynn (a mid-level prospect).

To acquire Garza, the Red Sox would probably have to trade two of Rubby de la Rosa, Anthony Ranaudo, Matt Barnes, and Blake Swihart. Keeping in mind that this would be for two months of Garza barring an extension, this would just be a foolish move. There is always the possibility that it will take longer than predicted to get Buchholz back in the rotation. However, Brandon Workman pitched well in his first major league start and can hopefully hold down the fort until then. All things considered, trading for Garza would just be a dumb move and it is good that the Red Sox are not a serious part of the mix.

 

 

Next Red Sox Game View full schedule »
Tuesday, Sep 22 Sep7:05at New York YankeesBuy Tickets

Tags: Boston Red Sox Matt Garza

  • John Fahrer

    They’d be better off trying to swing a deal for Lee for the rumored type of package the Cubs want for a guy who can’t be offered arbitration. They might be able to actually include Lester in a deal for Lee as well given the Phils aren’t completely out of it yet and might want a guy or two who is already mlb-ready.

    • Rick M

      I’d rather see they ship out Buchholz. Can’t see the Lee deal. He’d make a nice addition to any team but Phils are still in it and Sox clearing out the system just does not seem in their current business model.

      • John Fahrer

        Ship out Buchholz instead? No way. Lester still can’t match Buchholz win total and he’s had at least a half dozen more chances to do so. Buchholz durability issues do get annoying though. That’s why he needs to gain a good 30-40 lbs this coming offseason. Being an under 200 lb pitcher at his height is not a good thing.

        They do need to consider a pitching upgrade if Buchholz hits another setback. Really not much worth getting aside from Lee (the Phils are technically in it, but they aren’t going to catch Atlanta or Washington for that matter). Wouldn’t mind getting Garza if the asking price drops.

        • Rick M

          I totally have zero faith in Buchholz being able to start more than 25 games a season. IMO Buchholz has zero pain tolerance. Pinky hurts? Sit six weeks. He is the Drew of pitchers.

    • Conor Duffy

      Lee would obviously be the crown jewel of the trading deadline, but I don’t see Philadelphia trading him for anything not involving Bogaerts or Bradley.

      • John Fahrer

        Both those guys are deal breakers. Especially when we’re talking about a pitcher, though still very good, is 35 and owed a ton.

        • Conor Duffy

          I completely agree, and that’s why I don’t think Lee gets moved.

          • Rick M

            In 2012 the Sox managed to dump three large contracts and get prospects. So now we take on a large contract and dump prospects? LMAO! I doubt Benny wants to do business that way.

          • Conor Duffy

            That’s also my point of view…